Answer:No. A strong correlation does not imply causation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cause and effect relationship is not explained by correlations. A cause and effect relationship can only be established by carrying out carefully controlled experiments.
Hence, a strong correlation between the the intake of soda and accidents does not necessarily imply that soda intake causes accident.
A lurking variable in this study may be the speed of the drivers. A lurking variable is not controlled but significantly impacts results obtained from the study.
Since the speed of the drivers is not strictly controlled, it may just be a lurking variable.
Since both α and β are in the first quadrant, we know each of cos(α), sin(α), cos(β), and sin(β) are positive. So when we invoke the Pythagorean identity,
sin²(x) + cos²(x) = 1
we always take the positive square root when solving for either sin(x) or cos(x).
Given that cos(α) = √11/7 and sin(β) = √11/4, we find
sin(α) = √(1 - cos²(α)) = √38/7
cos(β) = √(1 - sin²(β)) = √5/4
Now, recall the sum identity for cosine,
cos(x + y) = cos(x) cos(y) - sin(x) sin(y)
It follows that
cos(α + β) = √11/7 × √5/4 - √38/7 × √11/4 = (√55 - √418)/28
The answer is:
<span>
a. there are 180 degrees of space on the chosen side of the axis of action in which the camera may be placed to preserve screen direction.
The camera must not cross the imaginary axis line to avoid creating a "reverse angle". Simply saying, the camera must only shoot on one side of the scene.</span>
Answer:
sorry bruv wish you the best i will pray for you
Step-by-step explanation:
The
correct answer is in file attached
<span>we have<span>
</span>
triangle RST<span>
</span><span>m∠R = 60, m∠S = 80 and m∠T=180-(80+60)=40</span></span>
<span>RS=4<span>
</span>
triangle EFD<span>
</span><span>m∠F = 60, m∠D = 40 and m∠E=180-(60+40)=80</span></span>
EF=4
Therefore
<span>The triangles
RST<span> and </span>
EFD are
congruents because they have two angles and the side common to them,
respectively, equal.
This is the theorem of ASA (angle-side-angle).</span>
Explication
Side common--------> RS=EF
<span>Angles RS------------- > m∠<span>R =
60 m</span>∠S =
80 </span>
<span>Angles EF------------- > m∠<span>E =
80 m</span>∠F = 60 </span>
<span>The segment which is congruent
to RT is FD, because angles of RT are 60 and 40, and angles of FD also are 60
and 40.</span>