Answer : jtuućh śhúéyxtéćh no eśpañól no énglissey
The way I see it, is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. Very likely that my comment will be deleted, but oh well, just wanted to see how this goes.
I tried, I practiced then succeeded
A couple years ago my grades were really bad but I started focusing on myself more and then got better at everything as I did a bit of revising everyday , only for like 30 minutes though but it helped a lot , I also stopped cheating on my tests and in class and focused on what I could and couldn’t do :)
More formal language in online communication increases perceptions of speaker competence, according to research on discourse formality in marketing, but conversely, people are more likely to like and trust speakers who use informal language because they come across as friendlier and more approachable.
Formal language can affect consumer sentiments in cultures where it denotes honorific rank, such as Korean, because it affects the implied meaning of the communication.
<h3>How to explain the information?</h3>
The rich honorific system in Korean is one of the language's most distinguishing characteristics. Korean speakers are required to communicate at a level (deferential vs. casual) appropriate to the position of the intended audience.
Korean honorific system itself serves as a natural prime for regulatory orientation given that the context of deferential (informal) communication reflects the setting for a prevention (promotion) focus. As a result, advertisements written in an informal, deferential tone are more likely to be deemed appropriate for use with utilitarian (hedonistic) goods.
Learn more about languages on:
brainly.com/question/10585737
#SPJ1
Choice E appears to be the best answer as it allows for an expansive essay that can focus on both positive and negative aspects of social media. The other choices would only encourage too much opinion or one-sided arguments, which would prevent the essay from developing into a thorough analysis.
