Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
Vignette would be a suitable answer.
Answer:
c. can use others' behaviors as cues for what's right.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that at the time of placing the participants in the darkroom for the first time and asked them to estimate the movement of light. Also, every participant made the similar estimates which results that they estimated are matched with each other
So this scenario represents the third option as a correct answer as one other participant received the clue of each other that based on the behavior of each other participant and due to clue their estimated are similar and matched too.
hence, the correct answer is c.
