1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zanzabum
3 years ago
13

Steve, the Human Resources Manager at Dusk Auto Services, is informed that Arthur, one of the contract-based mechanics, is HIV-p

ositive. Upon asking, Arthur admits to it. Consequently, Arthur is terminated from his employment even though his condition did not affect the quality of his work. Which of the following holds true in this scenario?
a. Arthur's termination creates no cause of action against Dusk Auto Services for wrongful discharge as he is an employee-at-will.
b. Arthur's termination is not justified because Dusk Auto Services failed to conduct an HIV test before hiring him.
c. Arthur's termination is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act because his HIV status did not affect his performance on the job.
d. Arthur's termination is not a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act because he did not willfully inform his employer as required by the Act.
Law
1 answer:
iris [78.8K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The scenario that holds true is the fact that " Arthur's termination is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act because his HIV status did not affect his performance on the job."

Explanation:

The American with disabilities act was established in 1990. This is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life including jobs and all other public and private places that are open to the general public.

You might be interested in
Amicus curiae briefs: A. help experts testifying in court get their point across. B. provide a way to influence the court when e
olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

B. Provides a way to influence the court when expert testimony is not allowed

Explanation:

Amicus Curiae briefs are filed by the people who have  interest in the subject matter of  the lawsuit but they are not party to the litigation. Amicus curae means "friend of the court" briefs. It helps to provide sympathetic advocate to address policy issues and expand the effects of a potentially important prior court opinion

Filing of amicus brief signals the court that the case is important and related to many issues apart form the litigants interests. e.g An amicus curae about public health speaks a lot about the health significance of the policies at stake.

5 0
4 years ago
Successful coping skills can be_______.
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

A. & B. Both

both be a perfect answer for this blank questions

8 0
3 years ago
Write statements that describe the two main political parties
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

<em>Republicans:</em> The GOP supports lower taxes, free-market capitalism, restrictions on immigration, increased military spending, gun rights, restrictions on abortion, deregulation, and restrictions on labor unions.

<em>Democrats: </em>The modern Democratic Party emphasizes egalitarianism, social equality, protecting the environment, and strengthening the social safety net through liberalism. They support voting rights and minority rights, including LGBT rights, multiculturalism, and religious secularism.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The marks shown in the land of this bullet are known as striations. These striations are
Kruka [31]

Answer:ummmmmmmm I think guns barbells lands idk don’t come at me I’m just trying to get free points

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • After you swallow an alcoholic drink, the alcohol is absorbed ...
    6·1 answer
  • When command is transferred, then all personal involved in the incident should be told
    8·1 answer
  • What is an example of globalization?​
    11·2 answers
  • Examples of social contract
    8·2 answers
  • Used to make composite images of suspects based on the victim's description:
    10·1 answer
  • 5. Define the following terms.
    10·1 answer
  • Help 8 and 9 ,10 thanks
    10·1 answer
  • Look at Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).
    10·1 answer
  • Importance of personal identification in the crime investigation
    10·1 answer
  • However, a few Article 2 provisions (e.g., the implied warranty of merchantability) are narrower and require a person to be a me
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!