1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karolina [17]
3 years ago
12

8. What was the policy of internment and who did it affect?

History
1 answer:
vesna_86 [32]3 years ago
3 0

The policy of internment required the Japanese citizens of America to report to the special camps to submit to the interrogations and to pledge loyalty to America after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in World War II.

<u> Explanation:</u>

  • The policy required the Japanese citizens of America to report to the camps irrespective of the place they resided in and the time they would have to travel.
  • It mainly aimed at averting espionage attempts by the Japanese. This uprooted and separated many Japanese families and made living conditions worse for them.
  • It affected the citizenship holders of America, Canada and Mexico who were of Japanese origin.
  • Immigrants were not allowed on a regular basis as they did not have much knowledge when it came to work.
You might be interested in
How did the king of England respond to the Olive Branch Petition?
Vikki [24]

D. He announced a blockade of colonial ports.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Considering the principles that the patriots fought for during the American Revolution, did the founders of the United States cr
DochEvi [55]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was it important for the pilgrims to write the mayflower compact.
agasfer [191]

Answer:

self governace

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
1. The Romans believed that all their wars were just wars." Do you think they were? Do you think
Rudik [331]

Explanation:

The just war theory is a largely Christian philosophy that attempts to reconcile three things:

taking human life is seriously wrong

states have a duty to defend their citizens, and defend justice

protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values sometimes requires willingness to use force and violence

The theory specifies conditions for judging if it is just to go to war, and conditions for how the war should be fought.

Although it was extensively developed by Christian theologians, it can be used by people of every faith and none.

Purpose

The aim of Just War Theory is to provide a guide to the right way for states to act in potential conflict situations. It only applies to states, and not to individuals (although an individual can use the theory to help them decide whether it is morally right to take part in a particular war).

Just War Theory provides a useful framework for individuals and political groups to use for their discussions of possible wars.

The theory is not intended to justify wars but to prevent them, by showing that going to war except in certain limited circumstances is wrong, and thus motivate states to find other ways of resolving conflicts.

'Just', or merely 'permissible'?

The doctrine of the Just War can deceive a person into thinking that because a war is just, it's actually a good thing.

But behind contemporary war theory lies the idea that war is always bad. A just war is permissible because it's a lesser evil, but it's still an evil.

Origins

The principles of a Just War originated with classical Greek and Roman philosophers like Plato and Cicero and were added to by Christian theologians like Augustine and Thomas Aquinas.

Elements

There are two parts to Just War theory, both with Latin names:

Jus ad bellum: the conditions under which the use of military force is justified.

Jus in bello: how to conduct a war in an ethical manner.

A war is only a Just War if it is both justified, and carried out in the right way. Some wars fought for noble causes have been rendered unjust because of the way in which they were fought.

3 0
2 years ago
How did labor and land ownership change after civil war
kvasek [131]
Following the U.S. Civil War, the Radical Republicans attempted to put a land reform through Congress, promising, 40 acres and a mule, to newly-freed blacks in the South, which was rejected by moderate elements as socialistic. This failure left blacks without an economic base, and was one of the key contributing factors to the development of sharecropping and segregation.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which divided colonial society in South Carolina during the 1700s?
    7·1 answer
  • Why was the new deal considered successful by many
    7·1 answer
  • Charles Darwin's theory of evolution as written in his book on the Origin of Species determined that
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is included in the Bill of Rights?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the romans reject the etruscan monarchy and establish a republic ?
    13·2 answers
  • Why would the National Convention kill King Louis XVI for “anti-revolutionary activities”?
    10·1 answer
  • What did a Union general declare inside that state to get him removed from command, angering abolitionists.
    9·1 answer
  • What easy research topic I can do for history 1301 for pre 1877 ? Please help !!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Encouraging free trade between countries and helping countries negotiate trade conflicts are the two most important jobs of the
    11·1 answer
  • What was the Proclamation of 1763?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!