1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maslowich
2 years ago
5

Why did the Native Americans not feel threatened with removal by the army?

History
2 answers:
Gemiola [76]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

They went to the Supreme Court, the court this time decided in their favor.

Jackson's attitude toward Native Americans was paternalistic and patronizing.

Explanation:

In 1830, just a year after taking office, Jackson pushed a new piece of legislation called the "Indian Removal Act" through both houses of Congress. It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state. This act affected not only the southeastern nations, but many others further north. The removal was supposed to be voluntary and peaceful, and it was that way for the tribes that agreed to the conditions. But the southeastern nations     resisted, and Jackson forced them to leave.                        

Masja [62]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

@Loaizaliliana5

that was not one of the choices here are the choices

CHOICES:

1.  The judicial branch had supported their position.

2.  The president was too weak to take action.

3.  It was a state issue and not a federal issue.

4.  They could fight the army if they needed to do so.

You might be interested in
Abraham Lincoln was not a
Cloud [144]
North! Back in 1967 that is
8 0
2 years ago
Napoleon adhered to which enlightenment princple
ivann1987 [24]
Napoleon supported many principles of enlightenment such as sovereignty, trial by jury, equality before the law, a citizen army, freedom of religion, abolition of feudal privileges, and freedom of the press. 
8 0
2 years ago
Do you think it is possible that there were free African American who we’re wrongly captured just because the color of thier ski
Tema [17]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

for those in the past, people with different phenotypes were called "animals" and non-human.

3 0
2 years ago
What actions did the UN resolution set for iraq
fredd [130]
The UN resolution set a deadline to cooperate fully with weapon inspectors.
4 0
3 years ago
What do you think might happen if there were no limits on civil liberties
Dennis_Churaev [7]
Civil war every day.
would result in anarchy.

everyone's house would probably be their own country.

I'm being serious. no limits means people can do whatever the heck they like
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which amendment protects the freedom of the press?
    6·1 answer
  • Which point is on the prime meridian?
    11·1 answer
  • Pls help it’s due today :))))))))))))))))
    12·1 answer
  • According to the Fourth Amendment, what must the government do before taking a person’s property?
    15·2 answers
  • Which answer choice below best describes Folk Culture characteristics?
    7·1 answer
  • Woodrow Wilson's "Fourteen Points" were designed to provide a blueprint for world peace that was to be used for peace negotiatio
    9·1 answer
  • Which answer choice describes how Korea was divided at the beginning of the Korean War?
    15·1 answer
  • Which two factors contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire? A:The Yellow Turbans led a rebellion against the emperor, which l
    12·1 answer
  • What were the two achievements of the first women’s rights convention at Seneca Falls?
    15·1 answer
  • Heil hitler hjhhjhjhhj
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!