Answer:
question is not clear please write carely
The Great Compromise of 1787 provided bigger states with population-based representation in the lower house and equal representation in the upper house.
At the convention, states' populations fluctuated, although not as much as now. The Great Compromise gave smaller states a disproportionately larger influence in Congress.
This is further explained below.
<h3>Which Constitution is based on and its often vague and ambiguous language?</h3>
Generally, The Great Compromise of 1787 ensured that smaller states had equal representation in the House of Representatives while bigger states received proportional representation in the House of Representatives based on their population.
At the time of the convention, there was a fair amount of variation in the populations of the states; nevertheless, it was not quite as great as it is now.
In conclusion, As a direct consequence of this, one of the most significant political repercussions that continues to this day as a direct result of the Great Compromise is that states with smaller populations have a disproportionately stronger influence in the nation's Congress.
Read more about Constitution
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ1
False, if you pay more that’ll help you pay it off faster.
The Spaniards wanted the land the french wanted the gold
<span />
First of all it can be used for a variety of purposes.. basically eating it drinking it... like chocolate an cookies :)
