Answer:1.The pretended power of suspending the laws and dispensing with laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
2.The freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;
3.by assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament;
4.by levying taxes for the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative as if the same was granted by Parliament
Explanation:
The reasons art these:
1. they created a structured system of state and federal courts.
2. made available the basic means of collecting taxes and producing money.
3. they find solutions to the boundary disputes with Great Britain and Spain.
4. they created a structured way for settling and ruling the western territories.
The passage shows that Californian politics, and in particular, political advancement methods, were not wholly bound by law as they are now.
Governmental institutions and government control was weaker at that time, so it was difficult to enforce the law consistently. Because of it, people did not have a strong commitment to following legal paths for advancement. Revolutions and rebellions were more effective in seizing power than political campaigns, and there were few negative repercussions for those who chose that method.
The chinese nationalist government adopted a strategy of trading space for time in its war with Japan. The japanese were also routinely attacked by : Local chinese resistance guerilla forces, acting independently of the Chinese Government
hope this helps