1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivolga24 [154]
4 years ago
7

What problem did economist mancur olson identify that passivity on the part of individuals?

History
1 answer:
Vlad1618 [11]4 years ago
4 0
Free rider problem

Economist Mancur Olson identify that passivity on the part of individuals who benefit from the work of activists but who do not join it or support it in any way. He called the problems the free rider problem.<span>In order to overcome the free rider problem, he suggested that interest groups and civil rights groups should give material benefits to the members only.</span>

You might be interested in
Why did some Georgia employees take furloughs in 2009 and 2010? The government wanted to collect more income taxes, so it called
kap26 [50]

Answer:D

Explanation:

Its makes the most sense and I got it right.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who believed moral behavior was important to their religious beliefs
timurjin [86]
I think hebrews. i may be wrong thow
3 0
3 years ago
Which set are yall reppin blooods or criip?
Misha Larkins [42]

Um... excuse me? lol

4 0
4 years ago
What events happen in spain in <br> 1808
liberstina [14]
Well a finnish war happened and the act probibiting importaion of laves also happened
5 0
4 years ago
Was the annexation of Hawaii justified
Lorico [155]

The answer to this really depends on what prism you are viewing it from?

As a globe, we are pretty opposed to imperialism these days. China has started to dabble a little more in the South China Sea but we mostly have our nation states and there isn't really a lot of movement.

That was not the case at the time of annexation.

So, is it ethical to subsume a sovereign nation? No

Was it strategically justifiable at the time? Yes. If the United States had not annexed Hawaii, the Empire of Japan likely would have stepped in.

Hawaii has enormous strategic value and was then justifiable at the time of annexation.

That being said, and I hope this is an obvious statement, imperialism is not a good thing and is ethically problematic.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What military traditions did the south an north have​
    13·1 answer
  • explain why thomas hobbes believed that people needed an absolute ruler. do you agree with hobbes' ideas? why, or why not?
    9·1 answer
  • Which list includes roles of the president? Speaker of the House, Chief Executive Speaker of the House, Chief Executive Chief Ju
    11·2 answers
  • The convention of 1792 abolished the _____ and established a _____
    7·2 answers
  • Just wanna make sure I’m right ??!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Someone plzzz help me on this
    8·2 answers
  • 4. Evaluating Why did many Jews remain in Nazi Germany
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Great Depression impact employment?
    10·2 answers
  • What was one goal of the repeal of Prohibition?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement describes the destruction the atomic bomb caused at Hiroshima?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!