<span>1.</span><span>I once saw an advertisement for a weight loss supplement. The
persons in the ad seemed to change significantly after using the product. Apart
from their appearance, everything seemed to be going better for them.</span>
Answer:
$355 unfavorable
Explanation:
Budgeted supplies cost was [$1,860 + (635 frames x $ 11)] = ($1,860 + $6,985) = $8,845
Actual supplies cost was $9,200, so the variance was = budgeted cost - actual cost = $8,845 - $9,200 = $355 unfavorable
Since the actual supplies cost was higher than the budgeted supplies cost, then the variance must be unfavorable (because more money was spent than expected).
Answer:
In 1990, 20 percent (20%) of new product development projects were next generation, break through products and by 2004 , 12 percent (12%) were next generation, break through products according to Professor Cooper.
Explanation:
According to Professor Cooper, In 1990, 20 percent (20%) of new product development projects were next generation, break through products and by 2004 , 12 percent (12%) were next generation, break through products according to Professor Cooper.