<span>Being Tributary has its own pros and cons. The advantages are development of each empire. Cultural infusion is unavoidable. sometimes the influence can be constructive otherwise destructive. Japan adapted the Imperial court system, art styles and Buddhism, whereas Vietnam and Korea were influenced by communism, that is usually frowned upon nowadays..</span>
Leonardo Da Vinci
Michaelangelo
These are the most common
Safety reasons is not a reason why nations conquered and created empires in the lands.
These nations conquered lands for different reasons
- For economic reasons. They conquered lands because of trade reasons and also to get the raw materials that were in these areas
- Religious reasons. The spread of Christianity was a reason for colonization
- Military reasons, The colonists arrived in America to escape warfare in their own countries.
- Philosophical ideologies was also a reason
- Political reasons was also part of the reasons for colonization
Read more on brainly.com/question/2074154?referrer=searchResults
Answer: It prevents political leaders from breaking laws to oppress citizens
Explanation:
Answer:
This study offers a comparison of the differing architectural styles and forms in the Norman Kingdoms of Sicily and England, exploring what exactly differed, as well as attempting to determine why such differences exist in each area. In the Kingdom of England, the Normans largely imported their own forms from Normandy, incorporating little of the Anglo-Saxon architectural heritage. There are in fact examples of seemingly deliberate attempts to eliminate important Anglo-Saxon buildings and replace them with structures built along Norman lines. By contrast, in the Kingdom of Sicily, buildings erected after the arrival of the Normans feature a mix of styles, incorporating features of the earlier Islamic, Byzantine and local Italian Romanesque, as well as the Normans' own forms. It is difficult to say why such variance existed, but there are numerous possibilities. Some result from the way each state was formed: England had already existed as a kingdom when the Normans conquered the land and replaced the ruling class, while the Kingdom of Sicily was a creation of the Norman conquerors; furthermore, the length of time taken to complete the conquest contrasted greatly. Another reason is that the pre-conquest cultural situation varied, as England was overwhelmingly Anglo-Saxon, in juxtaposition to the Italian, Byzantine and Arab elements in the Mezzogiorno and Sicily. Additionally, the cultural and trading influence of the Byzantine Empire and Islamic nations may have contributed to the eclectic architecture found in the Kingdom of Sicily. Other forms of cultural and artistic expression in the Kingdom of Sicily likewise show a cultural blend absent in England. Finally, there will be a brief look at the political and social situation in the two realms, in order to understand if these cultural expressions are representative of dissimilar societies and models of government. In the Kingdom of Sicily, a number of non-Normans rose to prominence, and some families which had held power before continued to do so. In England, the Norman nobility was much larger and held far more high-ranking positions. Architectural differences are therefore somewhat symbolic.
