1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maks197457 [2]
3 years ago
12

Was the cost of the war higher for the North or the South? Be sure to consider the social, political, and economic effects of th

e war. CIVIL WAR
Explain, in a paragraph of your own words, which side paid a higher price for the war.

Include at least two specific pieces of evidence from the lesson to support your response.

Include information from at least two sections of the lesson (Social, Economic, or Political) to support your response.
History
1 answer:
Korvikt [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

south

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What challenges did the Aztecs face when they settled in the valley of Mexico?
siniylev [52]

Answer:

Mountains were Steep and little level for farming.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Concerned with a case in which a group of students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war, Tinker v. Des Mo
larisa [96]

Answer:

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

The court’s majority opinion, written by Justice Abe Fortas, went on to affirm the freedom that young people have under the Constitution:

In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students… are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views

Explanation:

Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools.

Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. The school board got wind of the protest and passed a preemptive ban. When Mary Beth arrived at school on Dec. 16, she was asked to remove the armband and was then suspended.

Four other students were suspended as well, including her brother John Tinker and Chris Eckhardt. The students were told they could not return to school until they agreed to remove their armbands. The students returned after the Christmas break without armbands, but in protest, they wore black clothing for the remainder of the school year — and filed a First Amendment lawsuit.

Represented by the ACLU, the students and their families embarked on a four-year court battle that culminated in the landmark Supreme Court decision. Dan Johnston, a young lawyer also from Des Moines and just out of law school, argued the case.

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

6 0
3 years ago
Paying tribute included giving gold or human sacrifice victims to a larger, more powerful empire. Which empire forced others to
lesantik [10]
It was the Aztec Empire.
8 0
3 years ago
In general no one supported Alexander II's decision to end serfdom. True or False?
Nadya [2.5K]
It is false! I quote 'False' Believe Me M8
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The spanish conquistadors or soldiers became the representatives of the king of spain and governor general in its colonies. fals
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The Spanish king chose people to be governors in the colonies.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the Marshall Court rulings that supported the “sanctity of contracts” and federal law over state law boost?
    7·1 answer
  • Why is culture important?
    6·2 answers
  • Why might the US Federal government and State governments differences?
    9·2 answers
  • The ability to smelt metal led to which cultural innovation in early civilizations around the world? A. Development of governmen
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following movements was Doris Lessing associated with during her life? (select all that apply)
    8·1 answer
  • Who is South America's President
    15·2 answers
  • Which best describes consensus historiography?
    8·1 answer
  • This map illustrates the Columbian Exchange. Which contribution to the
    10·1 answer
  • What is something that shocked you for World War II?
    7·2 answers
  • HELPPPPPPPP
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!