Answer:
c) $75.
Explanation:
<u>The disposable income is the amount of personal income after taxes</u>
we can solve for taxs using the savings identity:
<em>Savings = Private Savings + Public Savings</em>
where:
Private savings: personal income - personal consumption
and Public Savings = taxes - government spending
We plug the value in the formula and solve for T
5 = 85 - 70 + T - 20
5 = T - 5
T = 10
Now, we derive personal income:
85 income - 10 taxes = 75 disposable income
Answer:
It is a violation of NASD rules against guaranteeing a customer against loss.
Explanation:
In this case the RR is guaranteeing the customer against loss. The customer initially bought the shares for $20 the new price is $10. The RR now coming in to buy the shares above market value is a way to guarantee the customer against loss, and its a NASD violation.
Answer:
the dividend revenue account is credited
Explanation:
As we know that the dividend is the company profit that is divisible and the same is to be issued to the shareholder with respective to the number of shares purchased
In the case when Yale Co. paid the dividend so here the dividend revenue account is credited in the case when the company received the dividend
Hence, the dividend revenue account is credited
Answer: 88.89 or 89
Explanation: Futures contract refers to a legal binding which obligates a buyer and seller to transact about a commodity, good, security or services at a predetermined price but goods are delivered or paid for in the future.
Given the following ;
Portfolio value(p) = $20million
Portfolio Beta (b) = 1.2
Index price (i) = 1080
Multiplier = 250
Future value(A) = index price × multiplier
Future value(A) = 1080 × 250 = 270000
Number of contracts (N) = (portfolio value × portfolio Beta) ÷ future value
N = ($20,000,000×1.2)÷270000
N = 24000000 ÷×270000
N = 88.8888=88.89
N = 89 (NEAREST whole number)
Answer: Production is characterized by significant economies of scale is not an assumption of perfect competition (A)
Explanation:
A perfect competition is a form of market structure that has many buyers and may sellers. In a perfect competition, there is a free entry and exit for producers as there is no barrier.
Also, firms are price takers as no producer can influence the price of the goods in the market unlike in an imperfect competition which is a price maker as producers can influence price. Firms also sell identical products that are the same in quality, size etc.
In a perfect competition, production is not characterized by significant economies of scale. That is an assumption that can be found in monopoly.
Therefore, option A is the right answer.
