<span>The Twenty-fifth Amendment is the one you might be looking for you can study it on quizzlet that is a thing ive been using since 6th grade then again i'm in 8th quizzlet helped me pass my classes!</span>
Answer:
yes if you are getting ready for an interview that means you need to be prepared and wear casual suit or dress no jeans and a short casual wear
Explanation:
i know this cause i did an interview last year in 10th grade.
Answer:
B) proactive interference
Explanation:
proactive interference is tendency of previous learning to interrupt current learning.
since here, varian's previous learning of Latin is making him difficult to grasp Greek. It can be well explained by proactive interference.
motivated forgetting happens when people try to forget certain things which they find irrelevant either unconsciously or consciously
proactive interference is phenomenon in which current learning hinders the learning of previous learnt knowledge.
temporary amnesia also known as transient amnesia is phenomenon in which a person losses memory before, during and after sometime of the event(the particular event which one is not able to remember).
Here is a site for what you are looking for
Reform in Britain 1870-1914 - History Homewww.historyhome.co.uk/peel/politics/reform.htm<span>These notes examine the major reforms introduced into the UK during the period 1870 to 1914. ...During the 19th century Britain's government was the model most Liberals ... In 1903 the Women'sSocial and Political Union was founded by Emmeline ... up to the age of 10 (raised to 12 in 1899) and in 1891 it was made free.</span>
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
