Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A) Russia
B) Germany
C) Rhine River
D) the Pyrenees
And this is the correct option for the question:
D) the Pyrenees
Explanation:
The Pyrenees by definition, are not part of the Northern European Plain because it is a mountain range. The Pryenees forms the natural boundary between the Iberian Peninsula, and the rest of Europe (Europe is also a big peninsula), where the plain is located.
Germany on the contrary, has around a third of its territory in the Northern European Plain, the Upper Rhine River is located entirely within the Northern European Plain, and most of Western Russia is located within the Northern European Plain.
Answer: A. True
Explanation:
The basic principle associated with the economics is that the goods, products, and services are limited and demand increases considerably to produce them. The resources used for the production also increases considerably. The scarcity principle of economics deals with the limited supply of the goods that is coupled with the increase in demand this results in the mismatch between the demand equilibrium and desired supply.
Answer:
A) Federalists.
Explanation:
Federalists believed in a strong centralized government while anti federalists believed in the spreading of powers amongst states
Answer: A) Reduced; Safer
Explanation: Equiping highway riders especially drivers with adequate knowledge as regards safe driving tips such as being conscious of driving speed and speeding areas on the highway, the use of traffic pointers, poor habits which should be avoided while or prior to mounting the wheels and explaining essential traffic rules.
If drivers abide and put these knowledge into use, there will be reductiin in the need for highway policing which are used to keep drivers in check and the cost expended on damages caused by reckless and careless driving. This will inadvertently lead to a safer highway for both drivers and commuters.
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
