<span>The Government thinks it has the right to intervene in markets because it should be in charge of regulating and controlling the markets to set equal standards to everyone and, in this way,promote a fair competition. It does not mean, it should intervene in markets themselves, it just set the grounds and make people follow the law and rules </span>
Spain and France where the ones who battled for control of Latin America
The answer to this question is socialization :)
If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
Answer:
Capitalism is often thought of as an economic system in which private actors own and control property in accord with their interests, and demand and supply freely set prices in markets in a way that can serve the best interests of society. The essential feature of capitalism is the motive to make a profit.
Explanation:
hope this helps plz give brainliest
