Answer:
They fought for the promise to keep their land, hunting rights, and isolation from the American settlers.
Explanation:
Hello there emilyrtsai15, The American Revolution of 1765 was a rather bloody battle that the Native Americans of the Americas found themselves always entwined in. Native Americans fought on both sides of the American Revolution, the most notable tribes being the Iroquois, Cherokees, and Creeks. Their allegiances with both sides however were at most times highly unstable. They fought for the promise to keep their land, hunting rights, and isolation from the American settlers. Those that fought under both the British and Americans however met the grim fate of having everything promised in return for their support stripped of them in one form of another.
Hope this helps!
-HM
Yes, as this would ensure more equal representation for the US's states and all territories which is occupied without much care. These territories would be able to become involved, allowing the people more freedom and more power, creating a better living situation for themselves and therefore bettering the US as a whole by creating a new area of opportunity.
Answer:
Emperor Constantine
Explanation:
Emperor Constantine was the first roman emperor
<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that no, Rome did not achieve a balanced government since only certain people were allowed to vote. </span>
<span>P&G
had to overcome mostly religious and cultural hurdles. The biggest
hurdle was that a lot of women thought that if they use tampons, they
will loose their virginity. And in a majority Catholic continent such
as Latin-America, virginity is really
important; therefore many women restraint to use tampons for that
reason. </span>
