This is true because they didn’t think anyone else had rights
The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
The legislature must vote to put the amendment on the ballot.
Answer:
d good luck with the answer
Answer:
A. They were extremely precise and successful in every attack.
Explanation:
Depth charges are quite literally explosives in a barrel that sink to a set depth before exploding. They wouldn't be 100% accurate due to them tumbling as they went down into the water. You usually needed at least a couple of Depth charges before you could knock out a Jerry (slang word for German during world war 2, fun fact!) U-Boat submarine, and this still applies today.
