1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nika2105 [10]
3 years ago
13

Is there a potential problem if governments continually finance goods and services with borrowed money?

History
2 answers:
jek_recluse [69]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer, I believe is B
rodikova [14]3 years ago
8 0

Is there a potential problem when governments continually borrow?

b) Yes, eventually their debts must be repaid with interest.

A classic example in history was the experience of the French government under the Bourbon dynasty, which ultimately gave way to the French Revolution.

The French monarchy was the envy of Europe, and the Palace of Versailles maintained the most glorious lifestyle you could imagine. The royals and aristocracy lived large – too large. The government had accumulated 4 billion <em>livres</em> worth of debt by 1789. 1 <em>livre</em> in their monetary terms then = approx. $4 in our monetary terms in the US today, so that’s a $16 billion national debt. 40% of the government’s budget was going to pay interest on debts. And it kept getting worse. In 1786, for example, government income was 357 million <em>livres </em>and expenses were 555 million. So that's about 200 million added to the national debt in just one year. The debts kept piling on, and it was reaching a point when lenders were starting to say no to any further loans. The government had reached a position where it could not go forward without levying even more oppressive tax burdens on the people, and the people weren’t willing to pay.

It should be mentioned that, along with the regular lavish costs of the royalty and upper class lifestyles (all paid by the lower classes), a big part of the government’s debt had come from wars. There was the 7 Years War fought in Europe (1756-63) – known as the French and Indian War over here in the colonies. Losing that conflict didn’t sit well with France. And so when the colonial Americans broke out in revolution against the British monarchy, France devoted enormous financial aid (as well as officer support) to the Americans. The cost to France for supporting America’s revolution added up to 1 billion<em> livres </em> (about 4 billion in today’s dollars). This is part of what put France’s debt problem over the edge. When bankers and lenders would no longer give further loans to the French government, the series of events that led to the French Revolution fell into place.

You might be interested in
Why did only some Southerners support Republicans reforms
Ghella [55]
Not all southerners are republicans
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the most important "cost"<br> of WW1? Why?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

The most important cost of WW1 were human lives, as millions of people died during the war and later from many diseases.

Explanation:

WW1 was the most brutal war until then, which devastated European continent.

Although, material costs were enormous, human casualties were even greater.

Only nine millions who died in the war, millions who were wounded and deeply hurt, many families, even many countries devastated.

5 0
2 years ago
What was the U.S. government's policy in dealing with the American Indian<br> tribes?
Airida [17]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Because of the New Deal, the Great Depression ended in 1935.
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

Because of World War 2, the Great Depression came to a stop.

Explanation:

I'm pretty sure this is right. I hope it helps.

8 0
2 years ago
Which was not a way civilians contributed to the war effort?
tiny-mole [99]
<span>Depending on the war and time period, there are many ways civilians did not contribute to the war effort. Protesting the war during any time does not contribute to the war effort. Dodging the draft is another action that does not contribute to the war.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the prevalent philosophy of driving in america?
    9·1 answer
  • What makes bruno most unhappy about the idea of leaving berlin ansers.com?
    9·1 answer
  • During pearl harbor hitler's army was planning major attack on what russian city
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP Secret diplomacy is a term to describe _____ during the World War I era. A. unchecked political negotiations an
    14·2 answers
  • Franklin Roosevelt created a "Second New Deal" because
    9·2 answers
  • Please read the second paragraph. What is the main point of this paragraph? Put it in your own words .
    14·1 answer
  • Why do you think that American people picture a Plains Indian when you say American Indian?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the Greeks resort to trickery in order to conquer Troy?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did European merchants search for a sea route to India/ Asia?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the Great Awakening?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!