Answer:
The main motive for imperialism was to obtain and control a supply of raw materials for industries. This meant that a weaker country with abundant natural resources would be colonised. Imperialists were often brutal in the way they treated the indigenous population.
Explanation:
Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Cause I did it just now so you are welcome
The statement that compares the weight accurately is that An object weighs about two times as much on Jupiter as on Neptune.
<h3>What is the weight of objects in Jupiter?</h3>
This planet is the biggest one that is in existence. In this planet, if an is 40 kg in another planet, it would be likely twice its size on Jupiter.
This therefore gives us a summary to the fact that an object on Jupiter is two times more than an object that is in Neptune.
Read more on Jupiter here:brainly.com/question/3522722
Snow ,rock avalanches and frigid weather
