Answer:
We can list as similarities between these two empires their location, the way how they built their cities, and the period they build their empires. The differences, however, are more visible. For the differences, we can separate into two points: the government and the war practices.
Explanation:
The Babylonians were harsh with their laws. An example of this point is the Code of Hammurabi. Dated from around the year 1700 BC, this law agreement was based on the lex talionis, or "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth". The violence of these laws is one of the main differences between Babylonians and Hittites.
The Hittites Law Code was more complex and consistent. This is because of their nomadism, and especially because they had the precept to capture their enemies. So, their laws must be range. We can name their laws based on the concept of causes, which means, your actions would be punished according to their strength. However, there was no death penalty (capital punishment), and many of the crimes were solved trough tax payments or fines.
When it comes to war, the Babylonians were not used to combat. Even if they had an army and the pretense idea of expansion, they were closer to the research and scholar world. Many astronomical discoveries were proceeded by the Babylonians. On the other hand, Hittites were warriors.
Unless there are specific choices I can only offer you a list of potential answers.
Sherman Act (1890), Federal Trade Commission Act (1914), and the Clayton Act (1914).
The Sherman Act outlawed all forms of monopolization and any attempts to do so. It also set strict penalties for any and all violations of this law.
The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 created the Federal Trade Commission which oversaw national business practices.
The Clayton Act addresses more specific points but especially focuses on preventing monopolies through regulation of mergers and acquisitions. It also goes on to prevent discriminatory pricing and dealings.
Further reading can be found on:
https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws
I’m not 100 percent sure but I think it references Japan surprise attack on Pearl Harbor to kick off ww2 and causing the u.s to get involved (hope this helped)
Answer:
C) They taught artistic skills to laypeople
Explanation:
The answer is, C) They taught artistic skills to laypeople, we know this is the answer because, well, teaching is a form of contributing to learning. And, monks were pretty good at it. Another reason why we know C is the answer, is because teaching was one of the few ways that monks could contribute to learning since they were not allowed to hold public office or engage in business.
