1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Savatey [412]
3 years ago
9

Question 19 (1 point)

History
1 answer:
Nataly_w [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

  • Separation of powers refers to each branch of government having their own distinct powers, while checks and balances refers to the ability of each branch to prevent another branch from becoming too powerful.

Explanation"

The "separation of powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory.  The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu.  (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.")  He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.

Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall.  The framers of the United States Constitution embedded the separation of powers into the plan for US government.

As noted by <em>The History Channel, </em> "In addition to this separation of powers, the framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power."  Some examples of the checks and balances used would be:

  • Congress (the Legislative Branch) controls the government's budget, so the Executive Branch needs Congress's support to fund any of its desired initiatives.
  • The President nominates federal officials, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
  • The President has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority to override his veto.
  • The Supreme Court and other federal courts (the Judicial Branch of government) can rule that laws passed by Congress or executive orders by the President are unconstitutional, blocking their implementation.
You might be interested in
How did the supreme court’s decision in the Dred Scott case lead to the decision of southern states including south carolina to
atroni [7]

There were both economic and political issues involved in the decision of Southern states to secede.  The Supreme court’s decision in Dred Scott’s case spread the detonants starting in the strengthened Northern opposition to slavery, the internal divisions of Democratic Party and the reinforcement of the Republican Party which won elections with Lincoln leading them. Southern states gave their own interpretation to the supreme court’s decision and gave passage to the Kansas-Nebraska act, permitting every state to accept slavery or not . An important economic consequence was the beginning of  the “Panic of 1857” crisis  which started with railroads and big Northern bank collapses due to uncertainly slavery policies.

5 0
2 years ago
What advantage did the North have over the South in the Civil War?
timama [110]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Which civilization made iron weapons
ziro4ka [17]
The Hitties were the first who had access to iron smelting equipment. Hope this helps my guy! ;)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What advantages did the north have in the civil war?
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

One advantage was that the North had more resources than the South. The North had more people, more minerals, more factories, more miles of railroad tracks, and more ships than the South had. These advantages helped the Union army when they were fighting the Confederate army.

Hope This Helps

:)

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following techniques developed after the invention of writing to organize information and keep people interested wh
True [87]

Answer:

Narrative History

Explanation:

Narrative history is a method of writing history in a story-based format. This way of writing history makes past events more interesting as readers can interpret and analyze these pieces of information in a way that is relatable to modern understanding. It is divided into two forms namely; the traditional and modern narratives.

  • The traditional narrative follows a chronological format.
  • The modern narrative explains trends that influenced certain actions of people in the past and reasons why they did certain things.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Frederick Douglass, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and William Lloyd Garrison were involved in the push for __________.
    10·2 answers
  • The use of local languages in medieval literature was most revolutionary because
    10·2 answers
  • Summary of the history of political party systems and how they are today?
    10·1 answer
  • How does the bill of rights protect you as a student? Give 2 examples. PLEASE HELP ME :(
    15·1 answer
  • How were the Middle Colonies different from New England and the South?
    7·1 answer
  • What do you think laws are in place for?
    15·1 answer
  • What was an outcome of the wars for independence in latin america?
    10·2 answers
  • How would central america be different today if the united states extended to panama?
    5·1 answer
  • Which Islands did Japan invade and take that were part of the United States
    14·1 answer
  • Where did the southern colonies explore?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!