Answer:
Hitler's actions in invading the Rhineland was one of the events that caused the Second World War by breaking the peace treaty that had been signed at the end of the First World War.
Explanation:
After the end of the First World War, the nations that were defeated, including Germany, had to sign the Versailles Treaty and take charge of paying the millionaire losses caused by the war. This made many German officials feel humiliated, a situation that Adolf Hitler took advantage of to promote his ideals and form the Nazi party.
Four years passed from the moment the Versailles Treaty was signed until Adolf Hitler organized the invasion of the Rhineland. This action went against the agreements of the Versailles Treaty, placing the allied countries in a position of what actions to take. This situation brought different consequences that would later end in the Second World War.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Elizabeth’s room is almost always a mess. her parents attribute this to Elizabeth's laziness, which is an example of a dispositional cause.
Dispositional cause designates an inherent trait of an individual as the source of behaviour rather than external factors. We look for enduring internal attributions, like as personality qualities, to explain other people's conduct. The fundamental attribution error refers to this.
The process of attributing a behaviour's cause to internal factors including personality traits, efforts, moods, judgments, abilities, motives, or beliefs is known as the dispositional cause, also known as internal attribution or personal attribution.
Learn more about the dispositional cause here:
brainly.com/question/9649183
#SPJ4
Answer:
Muslims vary sharply in their interpretations of traditions.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Please mark me as Brainlineast.
Answer:
inconsistency
Explanation:
In argument or logic, inconsistency often referred as internal contradiction or logical inconsistency is a term of a fallacious argument, whereby two or more propositions are asserted that cannot both possibly be true.
Hence, in this case, being described as voluble, verbose, long winded and loquacious is contradictory to being described as an individual who has never utter more than twelve words sentence before.
Therefore the argument is rather considered as Inconsistency