The question is for any rational function. I give one example in picture below. There we can see that first part of the "rule" is true. we indeed have vertical asymptotes at every x value where denominator is zero in this case x = 3 and x = 1. but second part of the rule is not true. we can see that if we inverse x ( we have factor that looks like a - x we get positive function between asymptotes.
Answer is False
You have to subtract the degrees like in this picture:
It can be inferred that the siblings of the autistic children in the study do not have autism.
I’m pretty sure the answer is (2,1)
Answer: The answer is (b) The ranger will need to clear trail for more than 10 2/3 additional hours.
Step-by-step explanation: Given that a park ranger would like to clear more than 10 mi of trail. Till now, he has cleared 2 mi. From now on, he can clear 3/4 mi of trail each hour.
Since 2 mi of the trail has already been cleared, so the trail that is left to be cleared = 10 - 2 = 8 mi.
Let, the park ranger will work for 'x' more hours. So, we have
Thus, the park ranger will need to work for 10 2/3 more hours.
Hence, the correct option is (b) The ranger will need to clear trail for more than 10 2/3 additional hours.
