Aristotle lays the foundations for his political theory in Politics<span> book I by arguing that the city-state and political rule are “natural.” The argument begins with a schematic, quasi-historical account of the development of the city-state out of simpler communities. First, individual human beings combined in pairs because they could not exist apart. The male and female joined in order to reproduce, and the master and slave came together for self-preservation. The natural master used his intellect to rule, and the natural slave employed his body to labor. Second, the household arose naturally from these primitive communities in order to serve everyday needs. Third, when several households combined for further needs a village emerged also according to nature. Finally, “the complete community, formed from several villages, is a city-state, which at once attains the limit of self-sufficiency, roughly speaking. It comes to be for the sake of life, and exists for the sake of the good life” </span>
Many of the concerns raised by anti-federalists were about giving the government too much centralized power, as well as its lack of protections of the rights of citizens (which were laid out in the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments)
Answer:
Every inch of space in the wagon was needed for necessary supplies.
They die one again just stop my dude
