An argument may warrant additional support in the form of additional evidence when <span>your audience strongly agrees with your argument.</span>
Reverse discrimination is basically the practice of minority groups being unfair or discriminating against majority groups. I think that it is completely possible to protect the rights of minority groups while preventing reverse discrimination because we can all just come together as people instead of different races etc... we should all be judged and given based on merit since we are all humans and this would of course work if nobody cared at all about minority or majority or race or sex or whatever...
Answer: D. The author uses his or her own friends as examples.
Explanation: The author makes the point: <u>"They learn that they are good at something and feel proud of that."</u>
Then, the author goes on afterwards saying, <u>"For example, my classmate Elizabeth has played basketball for three years. When she first started, she barely knew how to dribble. Now, she makes two out of three free throw shots."</u>
^^ The author is supporting their point with the evidence of his or her own friends as examples.
I would consider reading through the piece of literature (a book, a poem, etc) and write down what the story was about.
Answer:
In 'Rules of Games', Waverly displays the traits of <em>persistence, intelligence and competitiveness.
</em>
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Waverly is very <em>intelligent</em> as she learns<em> the rules of chess all by herself.</em> She even becomes a chess champion at a very young age as she was very smart and her intellect had no bounds.
She was also very <em>persistent and competitive as she would always face stronger and bigger opponents in chess matches</em>. She has learnt 'the art of invisible strength' from her mother, <em>due to which she is able to fight against all her opponents.
</em>
