What was the result of Octavian surrendering all of his power to the Senate?

History

1 answer:

Kruka [31]3 years ago

6 0

The correct answer is B) the Senate awarded him even more power.

The result of Octavian surrendering all of his power to the Senate was that the senate awarded him even more power.

Octavian Augustus had already planned. After so many years of Emperor exerting total power and control over Rome, in 27 BCE, Octavian decided to surrender his power to the Senate, quitting his consulship. He was beginning his seventh term as consul of Rome. Almost the entire Senate were followers and decided supporters of Octavious, so the Senate did not accept his decision and gave him even more power, arguing that Rome needed to maintain unity.

You might be interested in

Pa help po food chain and food web

vlabodo [156]

Answer:

1.sun➡️ tree ➡️mouse ➡️eagle ➡️fungi

2.sun➡️ tree➡️ rabbit➡️ lion ➡️fungi

3.sun ➡️tree ➡️ goat➡️ snake➡️ eagle ➡️fungi

there are 3 food chain but their relationship with others they are depended on their food.

6 0

3 years ago

The first battle at Bull Run (Manassas) convinced the Union Army they could defeat the Confederates.

Sophie [7]

No, it is false that first battle at Bull Run (Manassas) convinced the Union Army they could defeat the Confederates, since this battle ended with a Confederate Victory.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The president nominates a candidate for the supremem court justice, but which part of congress must approve his/her nomination?

Andreas93 [3]

I bielieve the answer is D <span>the secretary of judicial affairs</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What achievements did American troops accomplish in the European theatre following D-Day

skad [1K]

They achieved weakening the Nazis and helping to boost morale of the allied powers.

3 0

3 years ago

There's a widening gap between rich and poor countries. What could an international organization such as the IMF, World Bank, or

weqwewe [10]

Being multinational organisations the IMF, World Bank and WTO can start programs that not only would focus on providing shelter, food and clothing to the poor but also a good and sustainable source on income. By providing a sustainable livelihood to these poor people these organisations would them be able to provide themselves making them able to no longer rely on charity and donations in order to survive their daily lives. By having a sustainable source of income these poor people can have the ability to gain money which then can be used to buy their own food, clothing, shelter and education. The most important thing that money would give to these poor people is education. Through proper education these poor people would increase their knowledge enabling them to be qualified for higher paying jobs.

7 0

3 years ago