All categories

3 years ago

___ is the courts do not consider legitimate competitive behavior permissible if it results in the breaking of a contract.

Business

1 answer:

grandymaker [24]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:tortious interference

Explanation:

tortious interference is a law term that comes to mind when there is a breach of contract resulting from the competitor's actions. Tortious interference in Tort law(an area of law) deals with the situation in which there is damage to property emanating from intentional or negligent acts of the defendant, in this case the competitor in business. In which case the actions(competitive behaviour) of defendant is not justifiable and permissible and simultaneously breaches contract of plaintiff, it becomes tortious interference.

You might be interested in

eight cards are marked 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 10 such that each card has exactly one of these numbers. A card is picked without look

GREYUIT [131]

1/7 14% 0.14
I need more letters

6 0

3 years ago

Compensation paid in proportion to the number of units of personal output best describes:_______.

mart [117]

Compensation paid in proportion to the number of units of personal output best describes piece rates. When an employee is paid on a piece rate, they are paid per unit.

This means that the worker is paid based on how much is picked, packed, pruned, or made. The piece rate system boosts employee productivity by making sure they are focused on achieving their goals. A worker can be employed to work shifts that are paid hourly and on a piece rate basis.

An employee is compensated on a piece rate basis. This indicates that the amount picked, packed, pruned, or made determines the employee's compensation rate. Piece rates are used instead of the hourly or weekly pay rate when payment is made.

To learn more about piece rate, click here.

brainly.com/question/18492078

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

Zoe Corporation has the following information for the month of March: Purchases $ 92,000 Materials inventory, March 1 6,000 Mate

NARA [144]

Answer:

Part (a) a statement of cost of goods manufactured

Raw Materials (see calculations) 90,000

Direct labor 25,000

Factory overhead 37,000

Total Manufacturing Cost 152,000

Add Opening Work In Progress 22,000

Less Closing Work In Progress (23,500)

Cost of goods manufactured 106,500

Part (b) an income statement for the month ended March 31

Sales 257,000

Less Cost of Goods Sold

Opening Stock of Finished Goods 21,000

Add Cost of goods manufactured 106,500

Less Closing Stock of Finished Goods (30,000) (97,500)

Gross Profit 159,500

Less Expenses

Sales and administrative expenses (79,000)

Net Income 80,500

Part (c) the "Inventory" section of the balance sheet

Raw Materials 8,000

Work In Progress 23,500

Finished goods inventory 30,000

Total 61,500

Explanation:

Part (a) a statement of cost of goods manufactured

Calculate the Cost of Raw Materials transferred to Manufacturing Process;

Hint: Open a Raw Materials T - Account.

Debits :

Materials inventory March 1 $6,000

Purchases $92,000

Totals $98,000

Credits :

Materials inventory, March 31 8,000

Manufacturing Account (Balancing figure) $90,000

Totals $98,000

6 0

3 years ago

An organization that wants to comply with _______ requirements must develop a total management system for meeting environmental

alexandr402 [8]

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is an international standard-setting body composed of representatives from various national standards organizations.

Founded on 23 February 1947, the organization promotes worldwide proprietary, industrial and commercial standards. It is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, and as of 2015 works in 163 countries.

It was one of the first organizations granted general consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council.

5 0

3 years ago

Beginners Run Ski Shop sells a pair of skis to Crystal. When Crystal first uses the skis, theysnap in two. The cause is somethin

enyata [817]

Answer:

b. the implied warranty of merchantability

Explanation:

Implied warranty of merchantability refers to an implied assurance, in every sales transaction that the seller's goods are safe and fit for intended purpose of usage.

It represents an unspoken guarantee on the part of the seller that his goods conform to the acceptable standards and properly packaged and labeled and abide by the promises conveyed on their label.

The motive behind such a warranty being, the seller must properly inspect and test the quality of his goods before releasing them or making them available for sale in the market.

In the given case, the seller sold skis to the customer which cracked into two upon usage. The seller isn't aware of the cause of the consequence. Thus, the seller breached the principle of implied warranty of merchantabilty as per which, it should've first checked and inspected the skis before making them available for sale.

3 0

3 years ago