Answer: A. The statute burdens foreign commerce
Explanation:
The options are:
A. The statute burdens foreign commerce.
B. The statute violates equal protection guarantees because it is not rational to prohibit the sale of foreign beef but not foreign leather.
C. The statute substantially interferes with the vendor's right to earn a living under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
D. The statute constitutes a taking without due process of law.
From the question, we are informed that a cattle-producing state adopted a statute that requires any food service business operating in the state to serve beef raised in the United States and that a licensed hot dog vendor who worked at a football field within the state and who had been buying hot dogs made with foreign beef for the past several years calculated that switching to an all-beef hot dog made from United States beef would reduce his profits by 10%.
The vendor then hired an attorney to challenge the statute and the attorney discovered during research into the case that most of the footballs used at the football field at which the vendor worked were made of foreign leather.
Based on the above scenario, it should be noted that it is the Congress that has power to regulate foreign commerce. Hence, in this scenario, the state adopting a legislation that requires the private vendors to favor the breed served in the United States over the foreign products is outside its powers scope. Only the congress can make such decision.
The Marin Carbon Project (MCP) achieves carbon sequestration in rangeland and agricultural soils through research and development of scalable, repeatable “carbon farming” techniques. CCI’s Agricultural Carbon Program supports the Marin Carbon Project through applied research, policy advocacy, and development of economic incentives for producers and land managers. MCP recently demonstrated that the use of compost as a rangeland soil amendment can significantly increase rates of soil carbon sequestration, directly removing atmospheric carbon. MCP is now building on this work with additional, diverse demonstration sites and the development of a rigorous protocol that will enable land managers in California and beyond to sequester carbon and possibly participate in carbon trading markets.
No, Qatar is not doing the right thing in terms of public relations to publicize the soccer World Cup that it will organize in 2022.
This as it has not given a correct promotion of the event, nor has it sought to attract the public in relation to its additional attractions as a country, nor has it sought to connect with the eventual participating nations to carry out cultural exchanges, nor has it tried to attract other nations to the knowledge of their culture.
In short, Qatar, up to now, has limited itself to being a mere builder of sports facilities, without committing itself to properly promoting the event.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/20313749
Answer:
b. structural
Explanation:
Oppression is a practice of harmful and malicious pattern of injustice or unjust treatment given in a societal group or a regime.
In 1960s and 1970s, the new left social movements have changed the meaning of oppression. According to Young, oppression is the injustice and the disadvantage that people suffer due to the everyday practices of the well intentional liberal society.
Oppression may be also referred to the systemic constraints on the groups which are not the result of objectives of the tyrant. In this sense oppression is considered as structural.
