Answer:
heyo!
city, state, and date?
<u><em>hope this helps >3</em></u>
Explanation:
Answer:
Girard uses the characters of Th<u>e actor at Line 88, Laertes and The army</u> in a mimetic function to show that Hamlet's revenge is in a sense half baked.
Explanation:
the character of<u> Laertes represents revenge theatre</u> which was one of the targets of Shakespeare's Hamlet.<u> the character's drive for revenge along with purgative mourning shows the futility of revenge</u> on theater.
The interactions with the army and the actors come before that and lay a groundwork for Hamlet not truly believing in his revenge even as he is driven by it. h<u>e questions the validity of revenge</u> itself through these interactions, according to Girard.
Answer:In the first case, the character's enemy is the storm, as it makes him unable to reach the airport in time. Therefore, the conflict is one against nature. In the second case, the woman is angry at the treatment of women in the world. As this is a widespread practice, her conflict is against society. In the third case, the speaker is engaged in conflict with his parents, because they do not allow him to go to the movies. The conflict is one against others. Finally, the woman speaking struggles with her own selfishness, making the conflict one against her own self.
Explanation:Is that good.... Hope so.