The Himalayas were harsh, and hard to pass through. The climates were cruel and cold. Although, Hindu Kush was easier to pass through and typically had fair climate.
what is the question cant answer something if there is a question
Answer:
B. It is a common form of economic thinking
Explanation:
Thinking at the margin is a pattern of thinking where the thinker thinks forward with regard to the coming hour, the coming day, or coming income, while letting the past to go and considering what is presently best for the the thinker or in the coming times.
Thinking at the margin involves thinking ahead, and in economics principle, thinking at the margin is required for making rational decisions
An example of thinking at the margin is deciding to by more pasta for the month than required when there is a scarcity of a brand of pasta and the inflation, which may both be due to the introduction of better brand of pasta by the manufacturer causing a delay, and a temporary inflation respectively
Therefore, thinking at the margin is a common form of economic thinking
Answer: Wendy's schema of how a typical beach looks includes shells
Explanation: The psychological concept of a scheme implies that a particular image of something according to the scheme should look a certain way. This actually means that the brain connects a certain knowledge or experience to a particular event or object, subject, etc. Based on a certain knowledge or experience, one approaches a meaningful, known scheme, leading to known actions. So Wendy draws a picture of a beach with shells based on her beach experience or some previous beach image and approaches drawing with an understanding of the beach she already has.
Answer:
No impact.
Explanation:
In some countries, states do not have the autonomy to formulate their own laws. The US is not one of those. In the state territory, although there are laws that apply throughout the country, each state can formulate its own laws and these must be followed within the limits of the state and punishable by those who disobey. The law of each state must be judged in its home state and cannot be imposed on another state that does not accept that law as the rule to be followed. Thus, in relation to the above question, we can conclude that if state law in the neighboring state requires that interrogation be recorded on video, that law has no impact on state interrogation that does not require such recording.
