Bea Moran wants to establish a long derivatives position in a commodity she will need to acquire in six months. Moran observes that the six-month forward price is 45.20 and the six-month futures price is 45.10. This difference most likely suggests that for this commodity: futures prices are negatively correlated with interest rates.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are interest rates?</h3>
Generally, the fraction of a loan that is charged as interest to the borrower is often stated as a yearly percentage of the loan outstanding.
"lower interest rates encourage people to spend money on house upgrades"
In conclusion, Bea Moran would want to construct a long derivatives position in a commodity that she will need to buy in a little over half a year's time. Moran notes that the price of the six-month forward contract is now at 45.20, while the price of the six-month futures contract is currently at 45.10. Because of this disparity, it is quite probable that the prices of futures contracts for this commodity have an inverse relationship with interest rates.
Read more about interest rates
brainly.com/question/13324776
#SPJ1
Below is the complete question:
CANDIDATE: Thank you for agreeing to conduct some research to assess my potential as a candidate in the upcoming election.
CONSULTANT: You're welcome. As a first step, our team analyzed the other potential primary contenders. The reality is that with such a strong field, it is going to be difficult to gain the _______ of votes necessary to avoid a runoff unless you want to go negative from the start.
Answer:
Majority
Explanation:
The reality is that with such a strong field, it is going to be difficult to gain the MAJORITY of votes necessary to avoid a runoff unless you want to go negative from the start.
The appropriate response is economies of scale. It alludes to the cost advantage that emerges with an expanded yield of an item. Economies of scale can emerge in a few territories inside a huge endeavor. While the advantages of this idea in ranges, for example, generation and obtaining are self-evident, economies of scale can likewise affect zones like fund.
Answer:
$641,455.26
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the value of your retirement plan after 40 years
First step is to determine FV Using financial calculator
N = 40*12 = 480
I = 8%/12 = .6667
PV = 0,
PMT = $150
CPT FV =$523,651.17
N = 20*12 = 240
I = 8%/12 = .6667
PV = 0
PMT = $200 ($350 - $150)
CPT FV =$117,804.08
Now let determine the value of your retirement plan after 40 years
Sum of FV =$523,651.17+$117,804.08
Sum of FV =$641,455.26
Therefore the value of your retirement plan after 40 years will be $641,455.26
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
