Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. Current price is
= D1 ÷ (Required return - Growth rate)
= ($1.20 × 1.04 ÷ (0.1 - 0.04)
= $20.8
b. Now the price in three year is
P3 = Current price × (1 + Growth Rate)^3
= $20.8 × (1.04)^3
= $23.40
c. For price in 10 year it is
P10 = Current price × (1 + Growth Rate)^10
= $20.80 × (1.04)^10
= $30.79
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
Tania is a "limited partner
".
Explanation:
- A limited partner, commonly recognized as either a silent partner, seems to be an individual and therefore not just a week as a well-to-day corporate administrator. The responsibility of a limited partner could never increase the total spent by that department in the organization.
- For example, this type of relationship seems to have at least a single special partner but each restricted partner.
Find the given attachment
Risk that exists both before and after controls have been put in place is known as inherent risk.
What is risk?
The term "risk" refers to degree of unfortunately and possibility of loss, injury and hazard. Risk is barrier in the organization.
The various risk levels in a process that have not been regulated or mitigated by risk management are referred to as inherent risk. The level of risk present even in the absence of safeguards is known as inherent risk.
As a result, Inherent risk is risk in the absence of controls and after controls have been implemented.
Learn more about on risk, here:
brainly.com/question/14991895
#SPJ1
1. Evidence-based management seems like common sense initially, but the reality is not that simple. Managers are often hired based on their experience. Therefore, people tend to believe their word more than they would believe some types of concrete evidence. Moreover, even when evidence does not change, it can be interpreted in various ways by different people, making objectivity impossible.
2. Sometimes, evidence-based management might not be the best approach. This would especially be the case in situations where a manager might be very experienced. It might be better to trust the manager's interpretation of events as opposed to what the evidence might suggest.
3. It is unlikely that automated evidence-based management could ever fully replace human decision-makers. This is because automated managers might not be sensitive enough to human matters that are important for a correct interpretation of evidence.
4. I would want to work under this system, as ultimately the system is most likely to lead to efficient outcomes. Moreover, under this system, all workers are treated in the same way.
