Answer: Interestingly enough, there has always been a Wilsonian strain in American foreign policy, an idealistic belief in self-determination, and in some ways it was suppressed during the Cold War ”1 Thus, contrary to President Wilson’s ideas and the public opinion of the early 1900s, war still exists and will continue to exist. However, the objectives, or at least the public’s perceptions of American foreign policy, have taken on a new role. Americans have typically been idealists. Idealism has been present in the American mindset from its founding days and to an extent in American foreign policy; however, under President Wilson’s leadership, idealism took on an expanded role in American foreign policy.
Woodrow Wilson said on the eve of his inauguration “that his primary interests were in domestic reform and that it would be ‘the irony of fate’ if he should be compelled to concentrate on foreign affairs.”2 Fate would have it that President Wilson would lead the United States through the greatest war the world had ever seen. Although Wilson had limited leadership experience in foreign affairs in 1914 when war broke out in Europe, he knew how things should take place.
Explanation:
i looked it up:)
The answer would be, "E<span>nslaved people were sold to the Ottoman Empire as household servants and agricultural workers." Technically, this was less harsh than say, building houses or being a courier.</span>
<span>The job of the Committees of Correspondence </span>was to generate popular support for colonial resistance and weaken the authority of the British at the town level. A number of Committees of Correspondence were established throughout the original 13 colonies to create solidarity against what was considered as British tyranny.
The Federal Reserve Act<span>,</span>
