Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations require that used car buyers be informed of whether or not the vehicle comes with a warranty.
<h3>What is the Federal Trade Commission </h3>
The Federal trade commission is a body that is saddled with the responsibility of enforceing federal consumer protection laws which are aimed at preventing fraud, deception and unfair business practices.
The Commission also prevents federal antitrust laws that guides against anticompetitive mergers and other business practices that could result in higher prices, fewer choices, or less innovation.
Learn more about the FTC at brainly.com/question/2376957
<h2>Evaluating one's contribution gets employee thinking about their performance.</h2>
Explanation:
Self-appraisal is one of the best method to assess themselves of what kind of contribution that he has made to the company to grow.
He can also look back about the opportunities that the company has given to him to perform.
This actually,
- speaks for results
- gets the chance to do peer review
- an exercise to grow in terms of career
- list out the achievements of self
- contribution done by the self
So the chosen statement supports Dylan's idea.
Answer:
Q = 10
Explanation:
Assuming that supply remains the same, the new supply and demand equations are, respectively:
The equilibrium quantity occurs at the point for which the prices in the supply and demand equations are the same:
The new equilibrium quantity is Q = 10.
Originally,
Let x = the balance in the first account.
Let y = the balance in the second account.
The total amount in the two accounts is $9,000, therefore
x + y = 9000 (1)
Zack withdraws 10% of x and 60% of y for a total of $2,175.
Therefore
0.1x + 0.6y = 2175
or
x + 6y = 21750 (2)
Subtract (1) from (2).
x + 6y - (x + y) = 21750 - 9000
5y = 12750
y = 2550
From (1), obtain
x = 9000 - 2550 = 6450
The balance in the first account is
0.9*x = 0.9*6450 = $5,805
The remaining balance in the second account is
0.4*y = 0.4*2550 = $1,020
Answer:
The balance in the first account is $5,805
The balance in the second account is $1,020
