Like what do you mean by that
It's A.
Explanation: The Bill of Rights is a document drafted
in England in 1689, which imposed the
English Parliament on Prince William of
Orange to succeed King James II.
The main purpose of this text was
to recover and strengthen certain
parliamentary powers already
disappeared or notoriously diminished
during the absolutist reign of the Stuarts
(Charles Il and James II), in order to
put a limit to the absolute power of
the English kings.
Answer:
Architectural aesthetics and Urban planning in America
Explanation:
City Beautiful Movement was a great reform in urban planning and modern architecture. The shapelessness of American cities emerged into more developed and advanced with an extraordinary speed between 1860 and 1900. It promoted beauty to create moral and civic virtue.
Columbian Exposition 1893, Chicago, celebrated the 400th year anniversary of Christopher Columbus' arrival in America.
Both the movement and Columbian Exposition advocated the philosophy of beauty and the value of aesthetics required to promote harmonious social order.
Two websites:
http://www.nypap.org/preservation-history/city-beautiful-movement/
https://encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/61.html
Both these websites give a detailed description of two major historic event in America. It provides sufficient information about the events and their influence on each other.
Answer:
Explanation:
Background
First of all, you have to know who accused Hughes and of what. Hughes was one of the literary figures of the Harlem Renaissance.
As a poet, he saw his job, I would guess, as a trumpeter pointing out what was wrong with America. In that regard he was a fore runner to Martin Luther King. He (Hughes) did not preach violence. He merely testified before the Senate un-american activities Committee. His poetry came out when he tried to describe himself to lead council. Hughes was asked if he was influenced by the Communist party.
Hughes said yes, but his mind was like a sponge -- it absorbed material from everything he encountered. This was not what lead council was looking for. Like most lawyers, he was looking for a black and white answer and he wasn't getting it.
One of the blackest marks against America was the House of Unamerican activities. It flew in the face of everything the 1st Amendment stood for. So yes, Hughes had a perfect right to speak. He was not like Malcolm X or any of the other violent leaders of Civil Rights. He was a poet seeking answers. When has that become unamerican?
