In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
The Election Commission is regarded as the guardian of elections in the country. In every election, it issues a Model Code of Conduct for political parties and candidates to conduct elections in a free and fair manner. ... The election commission has the right to allow symbols to the political parties.v
Explanation:
Answer:
The threat of the grwoing power of Nazis
Explanation:
Answer:
The statement is false.
Explanation:
The Hebrews' book belongs to the new testament.
One of most popular verse of the Bible is it. Because it talk about faith.
The concept of faith is very important to understand the new life in God in fact the Bible says that if we don't have faith we can not please God.
Hebrews 11:1 according New International Version says:
Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.
