Modern society is often created by several interwoven processes that include choices economic changes, political changes, social changes and cultural changes.
Economic change can be defined as a shift in the economy's structure, policy, or growth. GDP can be used to measure economic growth. We can use this formula to calculate an economy's actual growth. To measure economic growth, we can look at the annual percentage increase in a country's GDP.
A community's economic development has a long-term impact. Job providers buy the goods and services they need to run their businesses, and their employees buy the goods and services they need to live.
Hence, the answer is "ALL OF THE ABOVE".
To know more about Economic change, click here.
brainly.com/question/5017832
#SPJ4
I think the appropriate response is perspective taking. Perspective taking is the procedure of briefly suspending one's own perspective trying to see a circumstance as another person may. A few methodologies utilized for taking another's point of view have been recognized, included envisioning oneself in the other's place, utilizing one's own particular comparative past experience to comprehend another's circumstance, and applying general learning about how individuals are probably going to respond specifically circumstances.
<span>The compilers of the national accounts can avoid double counting by recording only every second transaction in the economy. The statement that is presented says it's True. In order for us to avoid double counting, the only sales of final services and goods must be included. Take note, it is in the national accounts.</span>
Answer: Globalization and the attendant concerns about poverty and inequality have become a focus of discussion in a way that few other topics, except for international terrorism or global warming, have. Most people I know have a strong opinion on globalization, and all of them express an interest in the well-being of the world's poor. The financial press and influential international officials confidently assert that global free markets expand the horizons for the poor, whereas activist-protesters hold the opposite belief with equal intensity. Yet the strength of people's conviction is often in inverse proportion to the amount of robust factual evidence they have.
Explanation:
