The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
To what extent are political disputes and conflicts in the Middle East rooted in sectarian differences, and to what extent does this sectarianism impact the socialization of members of the different sects?
Indeed sectarian differences have been affected the relationships of many Muslim countries in the Middle East to the extent that these differences have been the causes of many conflicts and even wars. These sectarian differences impact the socialization of members of the different sects in that they automatically turned into enemies, more than rivalries, and it has been difficult for these people to establish peaceful relations in the region.
For instance, that is the case of two important Muslim sects, Suni Muslims and Shia Muslims. If the religious differences are already a big issue, now the political problems have increased the differences between the two.
In Jessica's case, but not Allen's, the money supply decreases.
Jessica completed the task of withdrawing funds from the bank, through borrowing. Allen made a monetary deposit adding to the bank's availability of funds. These funds are often borrowed by other patrons in who borrow money from the bank-as Jessica did.
People often obey a gevernment out of habit. Obviously habit is not something a new government has on it's side.
People hate a government which hurts them. Because people had time to adapt to old laws (murder illegal? work as potato farmer rather than assasin!) they are more hurt by old governments than new ones.
Whenever a country is 'liberated' either by external or internal forces, the liberators make all kinds of promises to all kinds of people. Some of these promises at least will be broken, causing members of the new ruling class to turn against eachother.
And often new governments lose the services of the most experienced police and propaganda men who worked for the old regime and our thus less able to defend themselves than established ones.
D. Dynasty. The reason is that a dynasty can have a ruler place his son (or daughter) on the throne, keeping the legacy on.
