1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arlecino [84]
3 years ago
8

What did Vladimir, prince of Kiev, do in 988 to help unify his people?

History
2 answers:
Licemer1 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

In 988 Vladimir prince of Kiev converted to christian orthodox in order to help to unify people. The father of Vladimir was a prince in Rurik dynasty. ... Vladimir consolidated the realm of Kievan from Ukraine, Baltic sea, Belarus and Russia. He unified people against Baltic tribes.

Explanation:i hope this helps

Jet001 [13]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Option: He converted to Orthodox Christianity

Explanation:

Vladimir, Prince of Kiev in 988 converted in Christianity to unify his people. He became the first Christian ruler to rule in Kievan Rus. Christianity remains in Kiev before Vladimir rule. When the trouble started in the Byzantine Empire during the reign of Basil II, Vladimir requested to sent military support. In 988 Vladimir converted into Orthodox Christian and ordered the Christian conversion of Kiev and Novgorod.

 

You might be interested in
How did Georgia convince other states to sign the Compromise of 1850?
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

Georgia Platform

Explanation:

Due to the boiling issue of slavery between the South and North with the potential of disunity and disintegration occurring over the passage of compromise 1850, there was need to douse the tension. This was done by Georgia through the adoption of a proclamation called the Georgia Platform.

The were able to hold a special convention where they drafted an official response to the threat trying to disintegrate the Us. The major point was that "<em>As long as the North complied with the Fugitive Slave Act and would no longer attempt to ban the expansion of slavery into new territories and states</em>" they are willing to accept the Compromise of 1850. Otherwise for these conditions,  would make secession inevitable.

5 0
3 years ago
QUICK PLEASE!!!
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

To print the nations currency

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Many Americans in the 19th Century believed in “Manifest Destiny.” Which of the following is true description of this concept?
lara31 [8.8K]
This question is tough to answer, since perceptions of Manifest Destiny changed radically across the 19th century.

But many American citizens, politicians, and thinkers genuinely believed in the tenets of Manifest Destiny, so it's not fair to say that these Americans were simply manufacturing a false excuse for westward expansion. So we can exclude C.

It's also true that many other Americans (especially Southern Democrats) used the idea of Manifest Destiny to justify invading Mexico in the 1840s. Bu these Southerners were more interested in adding new slaveholding states to the Union than they were with fending off a potential enemy in Mexico (which was a vastly weaker military power).

And while much of America throughout the 19th century was indeed Protestant, and that most of the residents of Mexican territories were Catholic, Manifest Destiny was less interested in dismantling Catholic influence than it was in advancing its own expansionist, Protestant interests. 

You'll want to double-check with your textbook to be sure about the context of this question, but the best answer from this angle seems to be B, since those Americans who did believe in Manifest Destiny certainly believed that westward advancement was not only obvious but sanctioned by God.

6 0
4 years ago
3. How did the troopers respond when protesters did not disperse?
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

On the night of 18 February, Alabama state troopers joined local police breaking up an evening march in Marion. ... by Clark and Major John Cloud, who ordered the marchers to disperse. When they did not, Cloud ordered his men to advance. ... white Unitarian minister who had come from Massachusetts to join the protest.

.-.

4 0
3 years ago
To answer the essential question you chose, use the evidence from your chart to build an effective argument. EQ:Was it in the na
AlexFokin [52]

The US before this point had an interest to stay neutral. However, in 1917, Jan 16, the US was informed by the British Empire US to join the war since Germany would help Mexico regain land lost, the US saw that as a problem. This incited them to declare war (This event was known as the Zimmerman Telegram)


So in summary, yes, it was in the national interest of the United States to declare war in 1917

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the English Bill of Rights influence US government? Check all that apply.
    6·2 answers
  • Base on the information in the passage which of the following is most likely to be true
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT true about John Wilkes Booth?
    7·2 answers
  • What important condition concerning germany's fate was decided at the end of the war?
    10·2 answers
  • How many years Michael jordan to win his first chmpionship
    8·2 answers
  • Help please sorry for low quality picture
    10·1 answer
  • Which side won the Siege of Stalingrad? Who would this be considered a turning point for, the Allies or Axis?
    10·2 answers
  • Why do you think the people of Italy, Germany, and Japan listed to and followed radicals like Mussolini and Hitler?
    11·1 answer
  • What two groups of people were separated by the Proclamation line?
    14·2 answers
  • What happens if security is not achieved in a society
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!