1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorLugansk [536]
3 years ago
7

Any law or action that prevents some group of persons from exercising a fundamental right will be subject to the ____ standard f

or determining whether the equal protection clause has been violated.
History
1 answer:
marshall27 [118]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Strict-Scrutinity

Explanation:

Strict-scrutiny is the highest and most rigid form of judicial review - that is a form of judicial control of laws to see if the law is compatible with the Constitution -. The Strict Scrutiny will be used in three cases, one of them in the case the law uses restrictive means to achieve its purpose. In this case, the law aims to prevent a certain group of people from exercising a fundamental right. This means that the law has restrictive means so it will be submitted to Strict Scrutiny.

You might be interested in
Which social effect may result from adding healthier options to a school lunch program?
stellarik [79]
Overweight children or children who eat excessive amounts of sugary foods and fatty acids might feel discouraged or embarrassed to pick unhealthy options, instead referring to the healthier options to avoid social conflict. 
6 0
3 years ago
All texts need certain structures to meet their purposes. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

t

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Truman Doctrine say?
Olin [163]
C....it pretty much told all of the countries to back off of south america
8 0
4 years ago
Can someone edit this and add more sentences or edit it.. this is about would u rather be a patriot or loyalist. Also can u add
kenny6666 [7]

Answer

i added a few things and deleted some oh and i added a conclusion

Explanation:

both Loyalists and Patriots fought for a similar thing... equality. I would go for the Patriots. Patriots wanted more than equality, they wanted freedom. They no longer wanted to follow British rules, they wanted a change for good. The Patriots wanted everybody to have a different view on the rules, and all agree upon them

Since I am a woman, in 1775 women did not have all the rights we do now. We were practically forced to stay home was not normalized to join workforce, all because of gender.  Patriots fought for freedom and equality, including gender equality. So that women would have more juties in society other than wash clothes and tend to their husbands and children. I agree that women should be able to make their own choices and as if for everyone. Freedom is needed for the world to thrive. The patriots believed that freedom was an essential part for their revolution.  

I believe in fairness, equality, and most of all, being able to have a choice. I have goals in my life, as everyone does. I wouldn't be able to accomplish my goals without the freedom to do so.  The bare necessities. It is unjust that some people would have an upper hand just because of his or her skin color, gender, identification, and financial status. It makes the world unfair and not worth living for. Everyone should be able to enjoy life that the universe has given us.  

As a 14 year old girl, life would be hard in 1775, with no freedom, equality, or choice. Many young girls during this time never got the chance to live their lives fully because they were young girls. My financial status isn't at its highest right now, but that is ok, because i know i still have potential. I will be able to work soon and figure out my own problems. Without freedom, equality, and justice, i wouldn't be able to achieve greatness.

In conclusion, I would rather be a patriot so i can keep fighting for my personal greatness I have a lot ahead of me, i can't let a higher being restrict me from crossing my own finish line. I chose freedom., respect, justice. I choose my future.

7 0
3 years ago
which supreme court decision acted as the constitutional argument in support of segregation laws until 1954​
kumpel [21]

Hey there!

Plessy V. Ferguson was a decision accepted into the Supreme Court that resulted as an costutainal argument. This is to support the segregation until 1954.

Therefore, our answer is: Plessy V. Ferguson

Learn more:

Main argument reasoning: brainly.com/question/12846797

Legal argument: brainly.com/question/10036412

Who is Plessy V?: brainly.com/question/3549143

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Anding
    10·1 answer
  • Briefly describe the causes of the end of the European medieval period. Be sure to use clearly organized evidence to explain the
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following public officials is directly involved with U.S. foreign policy?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the Ottomans convert the Hagia Sophia into a mosque Why was this conquest a turning point in global history.
    7·1 answer
  • Why was it important to for a medieval leader to have the Pope's blessing to rule?
    15·1 answer
  • What is evolution and what is natural selection
    13·1 answer
  • When making an interpretation of a past event, a historian
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement BEST describes the New Deal?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the main subject of Psalm 16
    11·1 answer
  • How did Allied nations limit the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!