What are the choices?
Comment those and Ill give you the answer :)
One major difference between Noah’s and Rector’s historical interpretation of the War on Poverty is Noah described poverty as a societal failure rather than personal moral failings.
Explanation:
In the interpretation of the war on poverty Noah and Rector does not possess same thinking. As Noah thought that poverty is a social curse in which one has nothing to do. War is one of the cause of financial crisis that led to poverty in the society. People used to lose their property, money everything in the war.
On the other side Rector do not think that poverty is a social curse. He thought that poverty is caused to anyone due to the failings of one's personal moral values. He thought poverty can be replenished if anyone's want. It has no power to be heavy on one's life.
Answer:
Hi , so your answer is that imperialism adversely affected the colonies. Under foreign rule, native culture and industry were destroyed , and Imported goods wiped out local craft industries. By using colonies as sources of raw materials and markets for manufactured goods , also colonial powers pushed back the colonies from developing industries.
Explanation:
Really hope i helped , have a nice day :) .
Answer:
The Colombian Exchange was an Exchange in between Native Americas and the colonizing Europeans. It saw the exchange of ideas (mostly from Europe), natural resources (such as crops), as well as diseases (which led to the demise of the native population).
~
Answer: You need to add more context, but I’ll say what I think you mean: , exutive makes the laws, legislative approves or denies them, and judicial carries them out
