Answer:
In 2005, police misconduct in New Orleans had reached an all-time high. In the weeks before and after Hurricane Katrina, several high-profile beatings and unjustified shootings by police led to intense federal scrutiny of the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD), including a 2010 U.S. Department of Justice investigation and a 2013 federal consent decree to overhaul policies and promote greater transparency and more civilian oversight of the police force.
In 2017, the NOPD aspires to serve as a model for how to reduce police misconduct. Rather than standing silently by—or joining in on a fellow officer's brutality—New Orleans
Answer:
concurring
Explanation:
a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.
In the case above, the crimes that the defendant has committed is known as Burglary and larceny.
<h3>What is Burglary and larceny?</h3>
Burglary is known to be the act of entering a building with the intention to carry out a crime.
Larceny is known too be a theft, and one do not need a structure or building for it.
Therefore, In the case above, the crimes that the defendant has committed is known as Burglary and larceny.
Learn more about defendant from
brainly.com/question/1259392
#SPJ12
I think that it is agricultural labor!
