Answer: No.
Explanation:
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, later amended by the Clayton Act (1914) prohibits agreements in restraint of trade and monopolization. I expressely outlaws competing firms to conspire to consolidate the market by unfair means, restraining the trade of others.
In this case, the standards for non-wood bats set by the NCAA and the NFHS are not meant to establish a monopoly and they don´t restrain Marucci´s trade.
Answer:
The rich would be powerful,
Explanation:
There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>D. Provision of minimum wages and poor working conditions for laborers’</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Some inequality results from individual skill differences. However, this cannot clarify the enormous gap among rich and poor in numerous industrialist nations. A significant part of the inequality of riches found inside industrialist social orders results from disparities of legacy.
Capitalism expands on verifiable acquired inequality of class, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. By managing more open doors for the age of benefits, it might likewise misrepresent contrasts because of area or capacity. Somewhat through the activity of business sectors, it can also improve positive else.
Answer:
Criminal laws at the local, state and federal level define criminal activities and establish legal punishments for those convicted of crimes like arson, assault and theft. Criminal law cases are only conducted through the criminal court system. In contrast, civil laws deal with the private rights of individuals.
Explanation:
