Answer:
Educational technology
Explanation:
Educational technology comprises of two different words, "education" and "technology".
Education can be defined as the process of acquiring knowledge, skills and values. It is the process of training and grooming people in the society. Education is the process of creating awareness in the society.
Technology on the other hand, Is the process of applying science art and skills to solve various issues relating to human life. It is also the process of making life easier for human existence.
Educational technology can then be defined as the application of science to solve educational problems. It could also be the use of science to aid teaching and learning.
Answer:
McCulloch v. Maryland was a decision of the United States Supreme Court. The state of Maryland attempted to prevent a branch of the Second Bank of the United States from operating by imposing a tax on all banknotes of banks not founded in Maryland. The Second Bank of the United States was the only bank then present in the state that had not been founded on it. The Court invoked the Theory of Implicit Powers of the Constitution, which allowed the Federal Government to pass laws that are not expressly provided for in the Constitution, from a list of expressed powers, provided that those laws are useful for Congress's powers, pursuant to Constitution.
Having my own house. As a child, it seems fun to have a place to yourself and be able to decorate it however you’d like. As an adult, you realize you have to pay a large amount of money for the house, bills, etc.
Answer:
Courts have begun to make freedom of speech more restricted in public schools due to outside problems such as drugs, threats, and riots (represented in the cases Tinker V. Des Moines, Bethel V. Fraser, J.S v. Bethlehem area school district, and Morse V. Fredrick.) Due to these outbursts, courts have begun to restrict speech that is a distraction to the school and school staff.
Explanation:
Answer:
d. Larceny by trick.
Explanation:
Larceny by trick is distinguishable in that a defendant who commits larceny by trick obtains only possession of the personal property of another, not title of that property.
For example if you ask a person to borrow their phone but have no intention of giving it back
