The answer is B. It's the most logical answer because country roads maybe steeper than normal roads.
The sentence from the excerpt that supports George Washington's belief that the U.S. should deal cautiously in economic affairs is But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand: neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; . . . diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce but forcing nothing.
From the excerpt, George Washington spoke about how it was important for the country to deal cautiously in economic affairs.
He stated that their commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand. He also stated that preferences should not be given to any country.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25139716
The simcell is going to expand due to net movement of alcohol into the cell.
<h3>What is Osmosis?</h3>
This can be referred to in science as the diffusion of solvents from an area of high concentration to an area of lower concentration through a semi permeable membrane.
In conclusion, The movement of the alcohol in this question would cause an expansion of the simcell.
Read more on osmosis here: brainly.com/question/2811191
As for the main disadvantage: the media need revenue. Revenue tends to be tied to reporting more dramatic events. In absence of truly dramatic events, the media develop tendency to "dramatize" (especially when it gets to political events). As a result we are observing what is usually called polarization. Media to the left and right of the center will tend to amplify certain aspects of reality. Viewers will then tend to focus on sources matching their own (political) affinities. Media source thus develop their own virtually separate audiences. A cycle of polarization emerges.
This is obviously bad for democracy which is based on the principle of educated decision making by every citizen. Citizenship has been more and more polarized and their decision making on issues delineated by political boundaries. Clustering is a problem. For instance, someone who cares about protecting the environment faces a decision whether to join a cluster of political views that include environmental protections (but also other views lumped together with environmentalism by the process of polarization), or completely stay away from that topic. That is bad for democracy.
The moment you see a person pronounced guilty vs. not-guilty by a vote that almost exactly splits down by the political affiliation of the voters, we know we are having a problem.
