Are there options to choose from?
Answer:
[B] religious morals
Explanation:
For a bit of a timeline reference, the period that the Social Gospel reigned was during the late nineteenth to early twentieth century. The Social Gospel was a group of people who tried to use their Christian faith to justify their ideas of what solutions to certain social problems should be. A way to remember the religious ties that the Social Gospel had to society would be the word <em>gospel</em>, which by definition relates to church and thus religious faith.
[A] Imperialism would be an incorrect response. Think of imperialism as typically belligerent or selfish nations who tried to get as many resources as possible from other developing countries, like how Great Britain was the mother colony farming resources from the colonies throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. For some extra context, imperialism was much more prevalent during the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries.
[C] Laissez-faire is a method of practicing capitalism that the federal government used in the US. The phrase <em>laissez-faire</em> is French and essentially means "let it be," which follows the conservative economic ideal of not regulating the market.
<u>Answer:</u>
The idea behind citizen owning property in order to vote was that the Americans don't want to give recognition to people from other race or ethnicity.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In 1789, it was decided that only fair Americans above 21 years of age and have ownership of land will get the right to vote. It should compulsorily be noted that such elites constituted a very meagre population.
This was a discriminatory type of enfranchisement as it curbs the right to vote of black men and landless African Americans.
The trial of Peter Zenger, a noted publisher in New York, worked to establish the rights of a free press.
Zenger's trial was still fresh in the minds of some of the founders when they worked to push for an Amendment to the Constitution a generation later that expressly gave the press rights.
It means that throughout history one main perspective or viewpoint has been shown off or presented as fact while others have been ignored. The Caucasian perspective. However this quote is also an opinion and should NOT be taken as fact.
