The context clues showed that Immaculeta didn't like her name at first but this later changed when she went back to her country.
The change was brought about because she didn't know the meaning of her name at first.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
It should be noted that context clues are the hints that are given based on the information that's given by the author. A context clue is a piece of information that appears next to a word or phrase while reading or listening and provides either a direct or indirect hint as to what the word or phrase means.
In this case, this was a story about a girl named Immaculeta who didn't like her name. She moved from an African country with her parents to abroad and she was sad the day that the teacher had difficulty in pronouncing her name. She thought she had names like Ashley.
She later moved back home during the festive period and met her cousins. They asked her name and she told them but she expected them to laugh but they didn't. They told her that she has a wonderful name which means purity. She was happy and this made her love her name.
Learn more about context clues on:
brainly.com/question/11247029
#SPJ1
The statement best compares the two passages in that the first passage hints that the family should not trust Walter with money or business matters, and the second passage confirms it.
<h3>What are the comparisons between both the passages?</h3>
The first passage intimations that no trust should be placed in Walter regarding business matters and Beneatha and Ruth respond to this by interchanging diverted looks, which allow that this is an open lie.
And in the second passage, we get the confirmation of what is hinted in the first when the Mother, after finding out what happened, starts propelling her son, in anger, not recognizing him as her son, until Beneatha interacts.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about passages, refer:
brainly.com/question/23662376
I believe it’s called a resolution
As she passed the shelves and racks, readers scanned her chip, and the disembodied voices of the e-hawkers began vying for her attention.
She disliked algorithms telling her what she was supposed to like, but they annoyed her even more when their suggestions were right on target as if they could see right through her, straight into her heart. "Emily, I'm sure juggling your schoolwork, soccer practice, and a social life is stressing you out."
Answer:
Speech about artificial boundaries can not divide the natural affinity among people.
Speech:
It is undeniably true that human bonds has no boundaries. A relationship between two individuals cannot be altered or severed by any human made territory. Though artificial boundaries may divide people into two or more territorial groups, the affinities among humans will always transcend such distinctions.
There is a unique characteristic in humanity that unities us in our diversity. There is a natural tendency within humans that makes us embrace each other regardless of territorial, racial or political differences.
It is an innate quality that each one of us has to unlock. Once we unlock this quality, we start to embrace one another and live in harmony with each other. Many a times human connections and bonds have proved to overcome territorial differences. In many instances, one can find that people living in border areas live with one another in harmony despite of political and territorial distinctions between them.
Therefore, the need to embrace one another is very important in order to prove that affinity among humans unite us ever in our diversity.
Explanation:
https://brainly.in/question/14238785
Hope this helps.
