Answer:
I am taking World Geo right now....we just studied South America. There are several factors as to why the population is concentrated along the coast. For starters the rainforests are not good for farming...there is no nutrients in the soil to sustain agriculture ( all of the nutrients are in the native vegetation) Another reason why people live along the coast is because major cities are along there. People migrate to the cities to look for work because the poor have no farmland and they need jobs to make a living. Alot of the good farmland is still held in large estates by the rich, which was passed down from generation to generation from when South America was being colonized by the Spanish and the Portugese.
Explanation:
If you want my opinion, all these are a great thing to do.But
However answer B. Would be more reasonable to this question.
Answer:
(hope this helps can I please have brainlist (crown)☺️)
Explanation:
By 1944, the home front had begun the transition to peacetime, despite the fact that World War II (1939–45) was still raging elsewhere. In 1943, full industrial and agricultural war production was attained, indicating the potential to satisfy continuous Allied requirements for war materials and food.
While war manufacturing did not halt or stop, it was no longer necessary to place a specific emphasis on war mobilisation. It was up to the military forces on the battlefield to win, and the odds of success were improving as time passed. Despite the fact that some of the heaviest and deadliest conflicts were yet to come, government and business strategists began to plan for calm. When the conflict came to an end.
The US was on the verge of becoming one of the world's superpowers: the economy was booming, the population was rising, and the military was stronger than it had ever been. Americans were eager to enjoy wealth and peace after giving their all in the war effort. The nation's status as a world power would be propelled for the rest of the twentieth century by the legacy of World War II's home front events.
The answer is <span>D. In this essay, he argued that being moral and just came before allegiance to the government.
While it is important that there were other people like Gandhi and King who promoted civil disobedience, that slavery was ripping apart the nation, and that the government itself was immoral and corrupt, the main point is that civil disobedience must come before allegiance to the government.
Both Gandhi and King would use civil disobedience to fight a government they believed to be corrupt. Thoreau, in his essay, could be an influence on these two with his words which were written many years before.</span>
