Answer:
In a classroom of several students with mild to moderate learning disabilities, the teacher would have to develop a lesson plan which employs different ways of including exceptional learners in the science class by doing the following:
-using examples
the teacher can give real form to the lesson by merging the varying illustration that best explains the topic from students' experiences to help influence the understanding of the students towards the new concepts.
-Using Videos
The teacher can choose to introduce videos on the internet to his students with special needs to sharpen and emphasize the understanding of he students towards the new concepts.
Crystal's behavior in looking up information in books, newspapers, dictionaries, and the Internet, illustrates the need for understanding and self-realization of Maslow's need hierarchy.
<h3 /><h3>What do you understand by Maslow's need hierarchy?</h3>
The Maslow sequence can be defined as a set of basic human needs in order for a person to achieve complete development and to make themselves real.
When we compare this crystal behavior with Maslow's need hierarchy requirements, it states that the need for understanding and self-realization must be met by Crystal.
Thus, Crystal's attitude toward looking at information in books, newspapers, dictionaries, and the Internet reveals the need for understanding and self-realization of Maslow's need hierarchy
To learn more about Maslow's need hierarchy, see the link:
brainly.com/question/13186630
Its been a while since I did this topic, but I believe it was mostly because under communism there was little work for intellectuals, so they were often the ones who left the country. This resulted in a 'brain drain', a lack of knowledgable people. I seem to remember reading about the entire maths department of a university just up and leaving at one point. You could also argue that it was damaging for the image of communism if so many people were trying to leave.
Answer:
Full Senate
On October 23, 1987, the Senate rejected Robert Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court by a vote of 42–58.