1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexus [3.1K]
3 years ago
14

Which president was responsible for signing the Indian Removal Act of 1830? Question 5 options: Andrew Jackson James Buchanan Th

omas Jefferson Martin van Buren.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Paladinen [302]3 years ago
5 0
Andrew Jackson was responsible
You might be interested in
What is the preamble of the constitution?
Archy [21]
The basic outline of the purpose and beliefs that the constitution stands for.
7 0
3 years ago
How did Democrats react to losing power during Reconstruction?
laiz [17]

Answer:

imma have to go wit B

Explanation:

if yall say sum to mee im telling my mommy on yall

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Round
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

Explanation:

it is C

5 0
3 years ago
A Massachusetts state statute imposes a prison term, without a trial, on all street performers who operate in certain areas. A c
Fed [463]

Answer: Procedural due process

Explanation: The principle of procedural due process refers to a legal principle which allows that a person must be subjected to a fair legal process before being sentenced, judged or deprived of liberty.

In the scenario above, the statute will be reviewed under the principle of procedural due process which allows citizens of the United States the constitutional right to be notified, heard or subjected to a fair trial before being sentenced or judged.

8 0
3 years ago
If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," how does he still justify civil disobedienc
iren2701 [21]
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which factor is not a major environmental concern for Central America, South America, and the Caribbean?
    9·2 answers
  • List of things about WW11
    10·1 answer
  • What philosopher, in his book man a machine, argued that humans are nothing more than complex machines?
    7·1 answer
  • ¿Qué corriente filosófica está detrás de su cosmovisión?
    14·1 answer
  • How does the GDP of the United States compare to the GDP of Brazil?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did susake leave the hidden leaf village
    15·2 answers
  • Bangladesh has a comparative advantage in textile production due to its low labor cost. The idea of comparative advantag:_______
    14·1 answer
  • How did gandhi use the tactic of a boy cott to further his objectives
    11·1 answer
  • Using your knowledge of the text and the chart, which best describes Lincoln's Reconstruction plan?
    12·2 answers
  • Why do you think people become archaeologists? why is it so exciting when new discoveries are made?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!