Answer:
India, Pakistan, and China are unlikely to risk a significant conflict over their competing claims in Kashmir because the three nations are nuclear powers, with which an eventual military conflict in the region could imply a nuclear escalation that would significantly affect global stability. .
Indeed, China is one of the five countries authorized to possess nuclear weapons by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. For their part, both India and Pakistan are not party to the treaty, and have developed their own nuclear weapons.
Thus, China has about 200 active nuclear warheads, Pakistan about 90 and India about 70, that is, the three nations have the possibility of destroying each other if they wish so. And it is precisely this possibility that limits the escalation of conflicts in the region: the fear of being destroyed by the enemy makes the peace to last.
The evidence for the claim that campaign money buys influence and elected officials ignore voters to please donors is tenuous.
<h3>What is a tenuous claim?</h3>
This is the type of claim that people make that cannot be said to be strong, definite of have been made sure of. People just make these types of claims based on the things that they think even though it may not exactly be true.
The claim that campaign money buys influence is tenuous based on the fact that the claim has not being tested to be true. It was just made by the people without any concrete information that would serve as pointers for the reason for such a speech.
Read more on claim here: brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
A bartender
hope it helps
Answer:
I would prob go with housing
Explanation: